FAO Quotables

"But being right, even morally right, isn't everything. It is also important to be competent, to be consistent, and to be knowledgeable. It's important for your soldiers and diplomats to speak the language of the people you want to influence. It's important to understand the ethnic and tribal divisions of the place you hope to assist."
-Anne Applebaum

Showing posts with label king mohammed vi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label king mohammed vi. Show all posts

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Amazigh-State Relations in Morocco and Algeria

Amazigh-State Relations in Morocco and Algeria

Finally getting around to posting my thesis.  I've posted it as PDF below.


ABSTRACT:

As some of North Africa’s original inhabitants, the indigenous Amazigh population in
Morocco and Algeria has withstood waves of invaders to retain a distinct cultural and
linguistic identity that has persisted within—and despite—nearly fourteen centuries of
Arab rule. The emergence of Morocco and Algeria as modern nation-states following
their independence marked the beginning of an ongoing tension between each state and
its ethnic Amazigh minorities. With one state (i.e., Morocco) more inclusive and
progressive and the other more repressive and exclusionary (i.e., Algeria), what are the
factors that explain the different outcomes in both states?

This study compares the two movements in Algeria and Morocco by investigating
the relative salience of two central variables—that of each state’s institutions and the
behavior of its movements—on the outcomes for the Amazigh community. The major
finding is that state institutions stand as the most potent variable due to their ability to
channel movement strategies towards either militancy or accommodation. This power is
largely illustrated through Morocco’s reliance on cooptation as an initial response to
expressions of grievance that has produced a milder form of activism. In contrast, Algeria
has defaulted to a more repressive approach (to any dissent) that has produced a strident
activism with radical offshoots. Movement behavior continues to play a secondary role
that largely hinges on its ability to use globalization as an amplifying and mobilizing
instrument for international pressure.


https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4BE1_xKfeEUTDlQc2c5UHRkVmc/edit?usp=sharing

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Morocco's king destroying hope for democracy?

This is an interesting article because the official diplomatic line from Morocco is that they are a democracy.  Period.  I am always skeptical when I hear or read this in the media and wonder if most Moroccans view their country as a democracy. 

In reading the article, it would appear that most of the country isn't fooled.  This then leads me to a more important question:

Do the majority of Moroccans care whether they are a "democracy", or are they happy with the status quo?  I also think it's a bit naive for "us" to assume the rest of the world believes that a US democracy is the best way to govern...but that's for another post.

An excerpt:
"According to Morocco's new draft constitution, the king won't be "sacred" any more. Instead, the people will owe him respect and tawqeer - an Arabic term which means something between reverence and adoration. So how much of a paradigm change is it really? Although the US says it is "encouraged" by the draft constitution, this is not particularly good news for the monarchy. This mild praise from a rather unknown state department spokesperson during a routine press briefing demonstrates, if anything, the cautious retreat of US diplomacy."
Photo by Azzouz Boukallouch