IMPORTANT NOTE: DON'T CHEAT. DON'T PLAGIARIZE. Notes and Papers are shared here for reference and for studying. Footnote as appropriate.
BONUS LINK: My entire (so far) grad school notes collection can be found here.
African Legislature Grad School Notes
BONUS LINK: My entire (so far) grad school notes collection can be found here.
African Legislature Grad School Notes
Joel D. Barkan, “African Legislatures and the ‘Third Wave’ of Democratization,” in Joel D. Barkan (ed), Legislative Power in Emerging African Democracies (Lynne Rienner, 2009)
Staffan Lindberg, “What Accountability Pressures do MPs in Africa Face and How Do They Respond,” Journal of Modern African Studies 48, 1 (2010)
- When the opposition is well represented, there are those
in parliament with incentives to assert legislature as legislature…regardless
these are self interested parties. In
Kenya’s case the MPs get paid 125K a year (well above median income)—they say
that it keeps them from being corrupted.
- at the end of the day the MPs themselves may be interested
in reform—he sees the push for free secondary education as a signal that they
may be trying to reduce the resource demands upon themselves by providing
constitutent services.
***the thrust of this argument is that nothing is
broken—it’s just answering the call of the people that force the system to act
in this way—a bottom up problem that requires a top down solution. So why do the constituents act in this
way? You have to find that out.
- this also point to the failure of institutions but why
would people want anything different—they know they can get something tangible
currently—broad public works or services are things they necessarily see.
- This comes from their perception and expectations of how
the whole system works—we elect you and you give us stuff.
- closer to the Hiden argument is the idea that there’s a
moral obligation to provide for the community from which you come.
- in some cases equally important is for the MP to be seen as being vocal and active in the
parliament—“that’s my guy” mentality
- parliamentary systems weren’t originally designed to
operate with a president so they were at odds
- in the 90’s it was redesigned to be more appropriate for a
president system which creates the opportunity for more institutional roles—but
they are starting from ground zero
- without permanent staff—how effective can an MP be? They need the committee staffs, otherwise
they just don’t ever address these types of issues (like a defense committee
would do)
- A PR system might address the problems of the constituent
services demanded but that might also open up another set of challenges. You might also be taking a hit on democracy
though
*How people are elected is important—
- the idea of “the provider”—the moral economy argument
would show that most people don’t really even have an idea of what their MP
does—he is just another with means.
- a pro-western monarch who oversees an Islamic democracy is
perhaps the most palpable of situations—this ensures democracy will continue
and not just “once”
No comments:
Post a Comment