BONUS LINK: My entire (so far) grad school notes collection can be found here.
Definitely not the most enthralling book you'll ever read, but a good primer on Eritrea.
Brief notes on Biopolitics, Militarism, and Development: Eritrea in the Twenty-first Century (Dislocations) edited by O’Kane and Hepner
Definitely not the most enthralling book you'll ever read, but a good primer on Eritrea.
Background:
Colony of Italy, relatively developed. Post WWII federated to and then annexed by
Ethiopia in 1961. EPLF wasn’t original
movement but comprised of lowland muslims.
1993 they are granted independence.
Ethiopia and Eritrea had opposite views of development. First, economic, the political strains on the
border, then all out war where at least 100K died. Mostly over 1 town: Bahgmay but then it expanded
(similar to current sudan situation except that it didn’t carry the same
history of a long negotiation). The two
countries didn’t originally give much thought to the border. What was the war really about? A conflict between local communities on either
side of the border? It wasn’t really
about the border since there were no resources but it was more borne from a
stubbornness of the Eritreans that ‘had fought for this for 30 years.’
Eventually, Somalis broke through and defeated Eritreans to
the point where they accepted defeat and negotiated peace settlement with the
UN arbitrating the border. Eritreans
didn’t originally like the UN border but then they noticed that they had the
town of Bahmay—just not the land around it.
So then the Eritreans were happy but Ethiopia wasn’t and wouldn’t accept
it—they’ve since effectively occupied Bahmay—and there’s been a cold war ever
since. Both sides fund/support
destabilizing groups in each other’s nations.
Originally Eritrean government was going to use mobilized
security forces to do development projects (hence their original rationale for
not demobilizing). But since the border
war, they have not been used this way.
They (Turabi in Sudan and Eritrea) both want to produce
national identity defined by commonality and to use the state to remake
society… but ?
To Consider When
Reading:
What do they say about the model of nation-building?
Authors are trying to understand what Eritrean plan is and
to what extent are they driven by an over-response (or is it an appropriate
response) to the war?
How are Eritrean people reacting to this complete government
control of society?
No comments:
Post a Comment