FAO Quotables

"But being right, even morally right, isn't everything. It is also important to be competent, to be consistent, and to be knowledgeable. It's important for your soldiers and diplomats to speak the language of the people you want to influence. It's important to understand the ethnic and tribal divisions of the place you hope to assist."
-Anne Applebaum

Showing posts with label islamism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label islamism. Show all posts

Thursday, February 8, 2018

The Myth of Monolithic Islamism (Grad School)

IMPORTANT NOTE: DON'T CHEAT. DON'T PLAGIARIZE. Notes and Papers are shared here for reference and for studying. Footnote as appropriate.

My complete collection of Grad School Notes can be found here (Africa, IR, Ethnic Conflict, Economics, Writing, Islam, Comparative Politics).     

For most of the 20th century Islam, and its myriad political manifestations, has been widely misunderstood (and misinterpreted) by most western governments and politicians.  Prior to two world wars and a slew of “lesser” regional ones, Islam’s existence in many Muslim societies was subjugated—or relegated to an afterthought—by colonial governments and the international community (i.e. the League of Nations and the United Nations).  With independence, however, a wide range of differing approaches to governance emerged, sparking an evolution in thought as to Islam’s value, stature and relevance in Muslim societies that continues today.  An analysis of this Islamic worldview may prove a useful tool for policymakers to better interact with and understand many Muslim states.  How have Islamists viewed the general Muslim condition in society over the last hundred years?  How have they diagnosed the associated problems of the conjoining of Islam and government?  What solutions have they offered and pursued?  I argue that the Islamist evaluation of the Muslim condition at large has been and remains a nuanced response to political environments.  The wide array of local conditions and grievances has elicited a wide-range of solutions, some more permanent but all influential to this day.  I begin by defining Islamism within the context of 20th century, as well as its roots.  Then I examine key shifts in Islamism throughout the time period through a discussion of central Islamic revivalist figures.  This examination ends with the rise of radical Islamism, as well as responses to it. Finally, I evaluate the efficacy of the different approaches and the different solutions offered and realized.  In particular, I focus on Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and Mawdudi in Pakistan.

Sunday, January 10, 2016

Thoughts on Islam in Morocco and the Role of its King as the Leader of the Faithful


Found this short note going through old grad school notes when I happened to be studying Islam in Morocco.  Perhaps I will expand upon it in the future.

In a system of belief, one of whose pillars is submission to God (two other pillars include, making the journey  and charity),  can one man climb atop the shoulders of this belief –a belief that burns like hot coal in the heart of a nation—and effectively own the course of Islam in that nation?  

Can a political party?  

Can the fact of a man’s ancestors lift him above the beggars’ heads in Marrakesh? 

Surely charity lies in the heart
In the community of believers
Surely submission to God
Lies in the prostrate spirits
Surely making the hajj

Lies in the believers’ humble feet.




























Thursday, August 22, 2013

Amazigh-State Relations in Morocco and Algeria

Amazigh-State Relations in Morocco and Algeria

Finally getting around to posting my thesis.  I've posted it as PDF below.


ABSTRACT:

As some of North Africa’s original inhabitants, the indigenous Amazigh population in
Morocco and Algeria has withstood waves of invaders to retain a distinct cultural and
linguistic identity that has persisted within—and despite—nearly fourteen centuries of
Arab rule. The emergence of Morocco and Algeria as modern nation-states following
their independence marked the beginning of an ongoing tension between each state and
its ethnic Amazigh minorities. With one state (i.e., Morocco) more inclusive and
progressive and the other more repressive and exclusionary (i.e., Algeria), what are the
factors that explain the different outcomes in both states?

This study compares the two movements in Algeria and Morocco by investigating
the relative salience of two central variables—that of each state’s institutions and the
behavior of its movements—on the outcomes for the Amazigh community. The major
finding is that state institutions stand as the most potent variable due to their ability to
channel movement strategies towards either militancy or accommodation. This power is
largely illustrated through Morocco’s reliance on cooptation as an initial response to
expressions of grievance that has produced a milder form of activism. In contrast, Algeria
has defaulted to a more repressive approach (to any dissent) that has produced a strident
activism with radical offshoots. Movement behavior continues to play a secondary role
that largely hinges on its ability to use globalization as an amplifying and mobilizing
instrument for international pressure.


https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4BE1_xKfeEUTDlQc2c5UHRkVmc/edit?usp=sharing

Monday, October 1, 2012

Partial Notes on the Gallab's "First Islamist Republic" (Sudan)

BONUS LINK:  My entire (so far) grad school notes collection can be found here. 

Below are my partial notes on The First Islamist Republic by Abdullahi A. Gallab.




Adullahi A. Gallab, The First Islamic Republic (Ashgate, 2008)

THESIS: Sudanese experience shows that Islamism (and all other ‘isms’) can and should be contested.

Introduction
Sudan was one of the 1st African countries to gain independence but the last 50 years have been a dismal failure.

The Birth of the First Islamic Republic
- in the first coup (30 June 1989) Al-Bashir (in Sudanese Defense Force) colluded with Ali Uthman Muhammad Taha (NIF) and Al-Turabi to overthrow Sadiq al-Mahdi but deliberately jailed Turabi and others to mask the fact that it was an Islamist coup.  They wouldn’t admit this till al-Bashir was deposed 10 years later. 
- This 10 year rule was a ‘reign of terror’

Revolution in the Sudan
- 1989-1999 revolution-like period at least
- Rise of dictatorial rule that used oppression to establish Islamist model distinct to al-Turabi’s Islamists ideas and state theories

About the Islamists
- What does Islamist mean?  Better to use “political islam”?  How do we use the term “fundamentalism”? 
- Since 1928 emergence of Society of Muslim Brothers (Hasan al-Banna), local ideological groups have evolved such as Sudanese Islamists.
- al-Turabi has led movement since 1964 through a number of variations of governance and political structure that continues to present

The Islamist State in Sudan
- Islamists in Sudan see themselves as making a fundamental break with Sudan’s past and the world at large
- National Charter for Political Action (1987) is a blueprint for radical change both regime-wise but also for an alternative society.
- first Islamic state was an embodiment of the comprehensive call which meant forcing people into “righteousness”
- With the coup one sees a fusion of Islamism and totalitarianism in the state’s rule and ideology

Chapter 1: Reflection on Islamism in Sudan
- al-Turabi overstepped in his initial aspirations for the way in which Islam in Sudan would become a global force and phenomena—a pan-islamic international order
- from base (qaeda) in Khartoum, they granted citizenship to Islamists from all over and formed two strategies:
            * Destabilize un-Islamic muslim and arab states and replace them
            * Claim leadership of world Islamic movement thru “Islamists Comintern” (under auspices of PAIC)
- within Sudan they violent suppressed all over religious groups to include muslims that fell outside their particular brand

The Islamists within the Sudan’s Social World
- Spirit of independence (and “invention of locality”) as an idea of cultural and historical continuity in Sudanese life
- Always viewed as separate from Egypt—this was characterized by Muhammad Ali’s invasion in 1820-1.  Sudan was primarily used to hunt for slaves and for resources.  However, inside Sudan fissions began to form along religious lines

Redrawing the Economic and Socio-Political Map
- 3 periods: british conquest in 1898, independence in 1956 and early years of Nimairi regime
- British failed to create modern state but did introduce Sudan to international system
- Independence Nimairi modeled nation after Nasser’s Arab Socialist regime (expansion of public education, transportation and comm.)
- Early Nimairi period saw crackdown on political parties, nationalization of financial institutions...
- peculiar nature of condominium composition: Britain’s unprecedented partnership with semi-colonized African state (Egypt) to colonize another country
- historically then, most northerners shared religion, language and some culture with Egyptians
- during colonial period, infrastructure and economy was developed (mainly in the north) to fracture dependence on Egypt—it basically gave them the tools/structures to for a nation-state.
- evolution of Sudanese identity: sacredness of Arabic language in relation to Koran; development of Arabic print journalism; spread of  Egyptian Arabic books and magazines and journals; orthodox islams as state religion; Arabism as major force.

Chapter 2: Elementary Forms of the Islamist Movement
The Elementary Form of the Movement
- Most say the movement is not connected to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and is self-made and novel
- Author argues that no trends were novel or original in origin
The Anatomy of the Islamist Movement
Determinants and the Course of the Islamist Movement

Chapter 3: Competing Visions in the Aftermath of the October Revolution
The Emerging Field of Power
Who is Hasan al-Turabi?
The Coup as Mode of Change

Chapter 4: From the Corporation to the Coup
Property, Power and Violence: The Islamists’ Pattern of Stratification
The Trail of Violence
The Hijra to the Camp
The Hijra to the Campus
The Migration to the Land of Plenty

DISCUSSION NOTES:

The first thing is the Nile and the way it ties it to Egypt moreso than any other country in Africa.  So it’s integrated historically.

- Ottoman Trachia is first conquest of Sudan (with help of Egypt).  Out of this period comes the Mahdist regime in the late 19th century.  Condominium follows this regime (overthrows it). 

Brits felt very threatened by Sufi Islam and so they integrated Islam into the colonial state to resolidify more orthodox elements of Islam. 

Politics have always been sectarian (not ethnic).  There have always been two parties that agree on Arab-Islamic Sudanese identity and that Sharia law should be used—but they disagree on how to implement and govern.  These two parties are Democratic and Umma parties (though their names go through many variations). 

Al-Bashir claims to be democratic but a more vanguard, democratic rule by the intellectual elite. 

Turabi is much more vanguard—he’s much more set on remaking society to his idea and then letting it choose his idea democratically after the fact.  Agenda of first republic is of Islamization and Arabization.  Their jihad is very complex—defeating the southerners first and then changing them to self-identifying Islamic Arabs. 

During the 10 year period, Turabi treats the civil war with south as a jihad.  He was always a real believer in his agenda—it wasn’t just about staying in power like with al-Bashir.  Turabi had a lot of support out of Darfur but his base was always at the university level.  He’s ultimately unsuccessful because he’s kicked out by Bashir in 1999.  Since then he continues to be a thorn in their side (even now at the age of 80).

Bashir doesn’t have much of an agenda now except to stay in power

*Arabization means Arabic is the official language and it’s taught in all the schools

Why did Bashir allow Turabi to create the PDFs?

Sudanese politics are always about the following agendas:
Assimiliation
Territorial integrity
*But they are pragmatic always
*Biggest issue after secession is the new periphery is closer with the lower 1/3 lopped off.  The periphery is closer and easier for Khartoum to marginalize and effect. 

*The three areas never voted on whether they were joining the north or the south.  The SPLA basically sold out those three areas because they were just concerned with getting the secession of the South.

- Post-Bashir Sudan is the biggest question!

- Paradox of Sudan is that it has a good democratic structure but that it’s always under military autocratic rule

- South was never secessionist until they found oil.  It was never a North-South problem but always a Center-Periphery problem (John Gareng). 

Monday, June 18, 2012

Notes Islamism in Morocco by Zeghal Malika

Below are my notes on Malika's book.  I used these for a few papers (links here in a little bit) and I pretty much already paraphrased all the notes.


Islamism in Morocco, Zeghal Malika, 2008, Markus Wiener Publishers
Malika Zeghal, Islamism in Morocco, Markus Wiener Publishers (2008)

Notes of Islamist Opposition in Authoritarian Regimes by Wagner



Islamist Opposition in Authoritarian Regimes: the Party of Justice and Development in Morocco by Eva Wagner


Below are my notes on Wagner's book.  I used these for a few papers (links here in a little bit) and I pretty much already paraphrased all the notes.



Eva Wagner, Islamist Opposition in Authoritarian Regimes: the Party of Justice and
Development in Morocco, (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2011).