FAO Quotables

"But being right, even morally right, isn't everything. It is also important to be competent, to be consistent, and to be knowledgeable. It's important for your soldiers and diplomats to speak the language of the people you want to influence. It's important to understand the ethnic and tribal divisions of the place you hope to assist."
-Anne Applebaum

Showing posts with label sudan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sudan. Show all posts

Friday, October 4, 2019

Kruse's Keys: Read "To Stop a Warlord" To See the Impact of Determination (Uganda, Sudan, CAR, DRC)

(Audible Read)  Read by the author Shannon Davis, To Stop a Warlord: My Story of Justice, Grace, and the Fight for Peace, was a phenomenal "read".  What I enjoyed most about this story was the way in which it challenged my own western conceptions of what justice means (even if I didn't complete agree with the outcomes).

This book is the story of how one woman created a new paradigm in how NGOs/charitable organizations should/could/can confront atrocity and evil by partnering with the military.  Shannon Davis is the CEO of Bridgeway Foundation and she decided to do something about Joseph Kony and his reign of terror.

The short story is that Bridgeway partnered with a private military contractor to train a special Ugandan military unit to hunt down Joseph Kony and his band of murderous, child-soldier recruiting, rape and pillaging, terrorist men.

In the end, they never got Kony (he's still at large) but they decimated his army, notably by shifting their tactics to one focused on recruiting his followers to "come home."  Practically, this meant a pivot towards a psyops campaign that included everything from leaflets, to radio broadcasts, to flying aircraft with a speaker playing recorded messages from the soldiers' families.  Of course, none of this would have been effective if Uganda and the international community had decided to prosecute every returnee.  Instead they made it clear that only the few major figures that were indicted by the International Criminal Court would be pursued legally.  The rest would be welcomed home and reintegrated into their home communities.  What made this process all the more incredible is Davis' storytelling where on one page she details the brutal rapes and murders of an individual and on the next a community welcoming that person home.  Honestly, this was hard to swallow for me and it's evident that it was difficult for the author as well, however; ultimately, this is a story about grace--which can be defined as undeserved forgiveness.  In this case, it's one of the highest forms of grace because it costs people so much (for more on this google "cheap grace bonhoeffer").

Other highlights include Davis' collaboration with Invisible Children, and her alternating chapters narrated by David Ocitti, a former LRA child soldier who Kony's henchmen forced to kill others just like him.  David's journey is remarkable as he embarks on a journey to broker grace and recruit home other children like himself.  But ultimately, it's Davis' clarion voice--reaching out with a mother's tenderness--humble with her own self-doubts that make this story such a powerful one.


*One of my Reading Around the Continent books--the full list is here.
**See our 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014 Reading Lists.






























Key References (for further study):
How One CEO Helped Counter the Violence of a Warlord
2019 NPR Interview with Shannon Davis
https://www.bridgewayfoundation.org/
Can a Court in Uganda Deliver Justice to Victims of the Lord’s Resistance Army?

Friday, February 8, 2013

BBC Chronology: Ethiopia, Djibouti, Eritrea, Somalia, Libya, Sudan

BBC Chronology: Ethiopia, Djibouti, Eritrea, Somalia, Libya, Sudan


BBC News has some excellent timelines/chronologies of various countries that are well worth the time to check out.  Here's there one on Ethiopia: Ethiopia Profile

I cut and pasted a bunch of them and put them in word docs a while back:

Monday, October 1, 2012

Partial Notes on the Gallab's "First Islamist Republic" (Sudan)

BONUS LINK:  My entire (so far) grad school notes collection can be found here. 

Below are my partial notes on The First Islamist Republic by Abdullahi A. Gallab.




Adullahi A. Gallab, The First Islamic Republic (Ashgate, 2008)

THESIS: Sudanese experience shows that Islamism (and all other ‘isms’) can and should be contested.

Introduction
Sudan was one of the 1st African countries to gain independence but the last 50 years have been a dismal failure.

The Birth of the First Islamic Republic
- in the first coup (30 June 1989) Al-Bashir (in Sudanese Defense Force) colluded with Ali Uthman Muhammad Taha (NIF) and Al-Turabi to overthrow Sadiq al-Mahdi but deliberately jailed Turabi and others to mask the fact that it was an Islamist coup.  They wouldn’t admit this till al-Bashir was deposed 10 years later. 
- This 10 year rule was a ‘reign of terror’

Revolution in the Sudan
- 1989-1999 revolution-like period at least
- Rise of dictatorial rule that used oppression to establish Islamist model distinct to al-Turabi’s Islamists ideas and state theories

About the Islamists
- What does Islamist mean?  Better to use “political islam”?  How do we use the term “fundamentalism”? 
- Since 1928 emergence of Society of Muslim Brothers (Hasan al-Banna), local ideological groups have evolved such as Sudanese Islamists.
- al-Turabi has led movement since 1964 through a number of variations of governance and political structure that continues to present

The Islamist State in Sudan
- Islamists in Sudan see themselves as making a fundamental break with Sudan’s past and the world at large
- National Charter for Political Action (1987) is a blueprint for radical change both regime-wise but also for an alternative society.
- first Islamic state was an embodiment of the comprehensive call which meant forcing people into “righteousness”
- With the coup one sees a fusion of Islamism and totalitarianism in the state’s rule and ideology

Chapter 1: Reflection on Islamism in Sudan
- al-Turabi overstepped in his initial aspirations for the way in which Islam in Sudan would become a global force and phenomena—a pan-islamic international order
- from base (qaeda) in Khartoum, they granted citizenship to Islamists from all over and formed two strategies:
            * Destabilize un-Islamic muslim and arab states and replace them
            * Claim leadership of world Islamic movement thru “Islamists Comintern” (under auspices of PAIC)
- within Sudan they violent suppressed all over religious groups to include muslims that fell outside their particular brand

The Islamists within the Sudan’s Social World
- Spirit of independence (and “invention of locality”) as an idea of cultural and historical continuity in Sudanese life
- Always viewed as separate from Egypt—this was characterized by Muhammad Ali’s invasion in 1820-1.  Sudan was primarily used to hunt for slaves and for resources.  However, inside Sudan fissions began to form along religious lines

Redrawing the Economic and Socio-Political Map
- 3 periods: british conquest in 1898, independence in 1956 and early years of Nimairi regime
- British failed to create modern state but did introduce Sudan to international system
- Independence Nimairi modeled nation after Nasser’s Arab Socialist regime (expansion of public education, transportation and comm.)
- Early Nimairi period saw crackdown on political parties, nationalization of financial institutions...
- peculiar nature of condominium composition: Britain’s unprecedented partnership with semi-colonized African state (Egypt) to colonize another country
- historically then, most northerners shared religion, language and some culture with Egyptians
- during colonial period, infrastructure and economy was developed (mainly in the north) to fracture dependence on Egypt—it basically gave them the tools/structures to for a nation-state.
- evolution of Sudanese identity: sacredness of Arabic language in relation to Koran; development of Arabic print journalism; spread of  Egyptian Arabic books and magazines and journals; orthodox islams as state religion; Arabism as major force.

Chapter 2: Elementary Forms of the Islamist Movement
The Elementary Form of the Movement
- Most say the movement is not connected to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and is self-made and novel
- Author argues that no trends were novel or original in origin
The Anatomy of the Islamist Movement
Determinants and the Course of the Islamist Movement

Chapter 3: Competing Visions in the Aftermath of the October Revolution
The Emerging Field of Power
Who is Hasan al-Turabi?
The Coup as Mode of Change

Chapter 4: From the Corporation to the Coup
Property, Power and Violence: The Islamists’ Pattern of Stratification
The Trail of Violence
The Hijra to the Camp
The Hijra to the Campus
The Migration to the Land of Plenty

DISCUSSION NOTES:

The first thing is the Nile and the way it ties it to Egypt moreso than any other country in Africa.  So it’s integrated historically.

- Ottoman Trachia is first conquest of Sudan (with help of Egypt).  Out of this period comes the Mahdist regime in the late 19th century.  Condominium follows this regime (overthrows it). 

Brits felt very threatened by Sufi Islam and so they integrated Islam into the colonial state to resolidify more orthodox elements of Islam. 

Politics have always been sectarian (not ethnic).  There have always been two parties that agree on Arab-Islamic Sudanese identity and that Sharia law should be used—but they disagree on how to implement and govern.  These two parties are Democratic and Umma parties (though their names go through many variations). 

Al-Bashir claims to be democratic but a more vanguard, democratic rule by the intellectual elite. 

Turabi is much more vanguard—he’s much more set on remaking society to his idea and then letting it choose his idea democratically after the fact.  Agenda of first republic is of Islamization and Arabization.  Their jihad is very complex—defeating the southerners first and then changing them to self-identifying Islamic Arabs. 

During the 10 year period, Turabi treats the civil war with south as a jihad.  He was always a real believer in his agenda—it wasn’t just about staying in power like with al-Bashir.  Turabi had a lot of support out of Darfur but his base was always at the university level.  He’s ultimately unsuccessful because he’s kicked out by Bashir in 1999.  Since then he continues to be a thorn in their side (even now at the age of 80).

Bashir doesn’t have much of an agenda now except to stay in power

*Arabization means Arabic is the official language and it’s taught in all the schools

Why did Bashir allow Turabi to create the PDFs?

Sudanese politics are always about the following agendas:
Assimiliation
Territorial integrity
*But they are pragmatic always
*Biggest issue after secession is the new periphery is closer with the lower 1/3 lopped off.  The periphery is closer and easier for Khartoum to marginalize and effect. 

*The three areas never voted on whether they were joining the north or the south.  The SPLA basically sold out those three areas because they were just concerned with getting the secession of the South.

- Post-Bashir Sudan is the biggest question!

- Paradox of Sudan is that it has a good democratic structure but that it’s always under military autocratic rule

- South was never secessionist until they found oil.  It was never a North-South problem but always a Center-Periphery problem (John Gareng). 

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Brief Notes on Biopolitics, Militarism and Development in Eritrea

BONUS LINK:  My entire (so far) grad school notes collection can be found here. 



Definitely not the most enthralling book you'll ever read, but a good primer on Eritrea.


Background:
Colony of Italy, relatively developed.  Post WWII federated to and then annexed by Ethiopia in 1961.  EPLF wasn’t original movement but comprised of lowland muslims.  1993 they are granted independence. 

Ethiopia and Eritrea had opposite views of development.  First, economic, the political strains on the border, then all out war where at least 100K died.  Mostly over 1 town: Bahgmay but then it expanded (similar to current sudan situation except that it didn’t carry the same history of a long negotiation).  The two countries didn’t originally give much thought to the border.  What was the war really about?  A conflict between local communities on either side of the border?  It wasn’t really about the border since there were no resources but it was more borne from a stubbornness of the Eritreans that ‘had fought for this for 30 years.’

Eventually, Somalis broke through and defeated Eritreans to the point where they accepted defeat and negotiated peace settlement with the UN arbitrating the border.  Eritreans didn’t originally like the UN border but then they noticed that they had the town of Bahmay—just not the land around it.  So then the Eritreans were happy but Ethiopia wasn’t and wouldn’t accept it—they’ve since effectively occupied Bahmay—and there’s been a cold war ever since.  Both sides fund/support destabilizing groups in each other’s nations. 

Originally Eritrean government was going to use mobilized security forces to do development projects (hence their original rationale for not demobilizing).  But since the border war, they have not been used this way.

They (Turabi in Sudan and Eritrea) both want to produce national identity defined by commonality and to use the state to remake society… but ?

To Consider When Reading:
What do they say about the model of nation-building?
Authors are trying to understand what Eritrean plan is and to what extent are they driven by an over-response (or is it an appropriate response) to the war?
How are Eritrean people reacting to this complete government control of society?





Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Sahel and North Africa Conflicts Explained: kind of...but not really...cool graphic at least



Sahel and North Africa Conflicts Explained: kind of...but not really...cool graphic at least
     This is a cool graphic that The Arabist posted on his website.  If nothing else, it shows the
complexity of the issues at hand in the Sahel and North Africa.  You should also check out The Arabist website--an excellent resource.
























http://www.arabist.net/storage/thumbnails/812518-19057274-thumbnail.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1341245225915














  


Sunday, June 17, 2012

Somaliland Constitution, Sudan and Samuel Wanjiru

I meant to post this weeks ago.  The insight is still valid.

BBC News - Somali leaders set transition deadline 
This article calls this event historic but doesn't explain why it is historic.  It's historic because they are going to use the Somaliland model.  250 elders will be sitting down to choose the next president.  The
elders will be chosen by July (God willing),  and the President chosen by August (breath held).  An important distinction, however, is that in Somaliland they enacted the policy over numerous conferences (lasting from months and years)—the question will be whether they are too rushed in the case of Somali..

Two other worthy articles to read:
The Sudans at loggerheads: Africa’s next big war? 
Runner Samuel Wanjiru’s Tragic Death : The New Yorker 

LINKS:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/05/21/120521fa_fact_rice
http://bbc.in/JpIuiC
http://econ.st/Le6YqV

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Nazis chasing butterflies, South Sudanese Insects, West African Coup Disease

What I'm reading today:




The former rebel Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) has ruled South Sudan since it seceded from Sudan in July 2011.
President Bashir described the SPLM as "insects" that needed to be eliminated.
Fighting between the two countries has now spread to another area, further adding to fears of all-out war.
South Sudan seized the Heglig oil field - generally recognised as Sudanese territory - eight days ago. On Tuesday fighting broke out north of Aweil in South Sudan, about 100 miles (160km) west of Heglig.
Generally recognized by whom?  What lazy reporting!  I know for a fact that SPLA leadership would dispute this "general recognition".






Secret files from British colonial rule - once thought lost - have been released by the government, one year after they came to light in a High Court challenge to disclose them.
Some of the papers cover controversial episodes: the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya, the evacuation of the Chagos Islands, and the Malayan Emergency.
In particular, the first batch of papers reveal:
Official fears that Nazis - pretending to catch butterflies - were plotting to invade East Africa in 1938



It took a while but we in West Africa learnt the very hard way that, given the opportunity, uniformed men are certainly more cruel and just as corrupt as their civilian compatriots.
The surprising thing was how easily the coups were accepted:
  • A group of soldiers seizes the studios of the state (and only) broadcaster and make their announcement about having come to save us
  • The entire population falls into line and members of parliament and ministers of state give themselves up to be locked up in police stations and prisons for months and even years


Mauritania is experiencing a vibrant protest movement touching many sectors of political and civil society. Each day seems to bring fresh reports of demonstrations or rallies, sit-ins or gatherings. A member of the 22 states that make up the Arab League, with a complex mix of issues stemming from political, social and financial inequality, Mauritania was naturally caught up in the wave of uprisings that have swept across the region since 2010.